www.bewet.fora.pl

loczytzn

On the corner, and culture of Fauvism: xiouyun_fei

And the angle of Cultural Fauvism
??????????????????Of: xiouyun_fei
????????????????? Original starting in 2010-08-01?? Popularity: 2618 animal horns to send my most respected friends. The public school rich five cars, knowledgeable, plus the public education in Beijing University, and has been engaged in research and teaching of modern literature, it should be said, his literary skills is unparalleled. This does not, in reading my book, \This is one of my favorite works, I say: Since you do not agree with my point of view, to write an article refuting it. This is not the next day we saw the essence of Mr. masterpiece.

be honest, I do not think it is a good split article. This is not to because her husband refuted in the article some of my view, phase, I'd want to have to really point out flaws and weaknesses of the article. I often think: an article, without thinking of the collision, like fallen on barren ground, is the most tragic thing. To develop the academic, thought to progress, mutual Debate, is a good way to temper each other. In particular, can be reasoned that the teachings, leaving a sense of style, such as bath. Chang Ting Wen-chiang, and then the two friends has an argument of science and metaphysics, a stone from Melaleuca, causing great debate was academic thought, left behind a literary legend. We certainly hope that everyone from the study of culture, may be able to leave a cultural story to the misty rain. Of course, this study must establish reasonable basis.

saying \Academic who is also the world of a public institution. Friends, or opponents, in the face of knowledge and truth should be treated equally. Socrates once said: Just right and wrong, regardless of the other. Distinguish right from wrong is the responsibility of intellectuals. Therefore, my eyes no longer want to drink with friends, only I want to refute the opponents of the.

Why does this refute the article does not work? There are so few points: First, the article gives me the beast brother first impression: the concept of animal experts brother is changing. Brother used to prevent the animal for Yantai Cordless concept, the concept of hanging my first, and then reveals how the beast brother deceive, beams for columns. The second means is through the subjective, pouring dirty to. I am always far-fetched ideas and official contact, it seems that I was getting rewards for as long as the proof of the official to speak to the Queen text. So, my view would be refuted, and this year is a little taste of slander Nalu Bu Lu Xun. Third, the critics in a famous saying; not studied there is no criticism. But obviously, Mr. Beast is not read my work, they begin to fire, and put on the appearance of precision guided missiles, bullets hit back at the original but it is the heart of corn stalks.

let us return to the topic, and brother to talk about animal culture. In fact, the culture does not talk about, like air, like culture, both all in, but we can not put it in his hands. So, talk about culture, we must first know what is culture? The actual concept of culture is difficult to define, contain too much content and too complex, that \be summarized in more than 160 concepts, still can not be described accurately. Now the basic concept is to be recognized: the role of general culture is the class of natural and social results in the total, including all material and spiritual wealth. Narrow sense: that the spiritual wealth created by ideologies, including religion, beliefs, customs, moral gymnastics, academic thought, literature, art, science and technology, a variety of systems. Includes six subsystems that, that is, material, social relations, spiritual, art, language symbols,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], customs and so on.

So, since my point of view to be approved, the text should be shown for I mean to criticize the culture, so as to feel targeted, it will be easier sparks and inspiration. I am the original text from the system of cultural, moral, academic thought, the brother of the beast was mainly analyzed from the perspective of art, It's a bit irrelevant to the flavor. For example, the same is about fish, one is talking about the fish of the sea is about a light fish, although on the surface talking about fish, but because talking about fish, not in the same discourse system to another discord was inevitable.

However, I now have to talk. First of all, I must state,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], \Multiple co-existence is based on a traditional culture can not cut made, the helpless, is a full disk westernized correction. Because the traditional culture, like the shadow that can not be separated, completely ignoring the influence of traditional culture, to promote total Westernization, is unrealistic fantasy. Why \In fact, my article has a purpose, which is the traditional culture and hopes the integration of Western culture, or can be like Yu-sheng said, \\\And cited many examples to prove: for example the scientific development concept in the thought of the people, animals brother added that \Scientific concept of development happens in the \More ridiculous is the beast as a brother to Westernization of the Soviet Union (for the concept of the two). It's a bit hung sell sheep dog flavor. When our house was still resolutely resist the corrosion of the western bourgeois ideas, while we were still claiming that \, beast brother said in early in the \And I do not know what time the beast into the brother in the official think tank, the official think tank, there are animals or brother's close friend, and even the principle of government policy are \What is government policy that the principle is: Multiple co-existence,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], west of the main. Brother do not know whether animal evidence. Mr. appropriate then said: There is an evidence that a point, then there is no evidence that says seven, then eight. I spread out his hands, brother to the beast cried; get proof! Brother, of course no evidence to take the beast, the beast brother is just confused by some illusion, some paradoxical things wrong when the truth only.

beast brother taboo about politics, this is because the misty rain is not allowed to casually talk about politics. However, I would like to ask brother beast, one has \Excuse me ignorance, is not citizens of the Western family is taboo talk about politics? Now, we are not about politics, or that we're not a home west of the main, or is too sensitive to our animal brothers. But as far as I know, the kind of sensitive animals brother is not precisely phase, are often too slow, otherwise you will not be because of political ill-fated. Therefore, the beast in front of the fictional brother had \Fortunately, beasts

brother talk about politics and culture to talk about, but the beast brother are talking about culture is not culture, but art. That is, the beast brother used here to replace the culture of the art (for the concept of the three). This concept would have been changed too, but it is also not too bad, but fortunately did not stray miles, at least in literary and cultural context still remains. In other words, the beast if it wants to refute my brother's view that should prove \However, the beast brother did not demonstrate, but added to the culture during the Cultural Revolution and now a single relatively multi-cultural comparison, to feel the government should have allowed multi-cultural existence in my opinion, \In fact, there is no old and new views of the other, only the non-distinction. We can not consider new ideas to be reasonable, therefore, I often think, in the most popular thing to do is basic common sense, not to create independent, shock theory. Besides, I Daoyaoqingjiao has been engaged in animal research, Mr. Art, literature and art we really do not have district? Our literature and art, and international standards do it? As for the beast brother wrote a large section of the purpose of development of arts and literature and art there is no debate class, Liang and Lu Xun seems to be not the end of the topic. And this has nothing to do because, together with the beast that is the brother of the study area, such as brother of the beast well, tell us nothing more conclusions, why write the article in such a split in it?

But the beast still do not like my brother \Please note that animals have been here my brother \(For the concept of four) animals art multi-brother seems, that \Said \recipe.

perhaps, the beast too long brother disseminated Chinese logic, it is inevitable to \This does not, beast brother got into the U.S. rulers of the mind, what is fiction, \So, the West really is the ruler of promoting cultural diversity results? In fact, multiculturalism originated in the 80's the United States, is based on the diverse multi-cultural nation shaped by the cultural identity of a group, rather than the result of the ruling class propaganda. Of course, here is a western management culture to the extreme, the value of their deconstruction of the Western subject. Cultural development of Western thought is not controlled by the ruling class, ruling class of Western intellectual thought is not endorsement, but an independent highly social critique \Mr. Beast again a moment of weakness among the U.S., right?

Mr beast; culture does not have the \However, when we see after the Opium War, flocking to Western culture, traditional culture and Western culture in the collision suffered a crushing defeat, is not that a kind of cultural impact it? Of course, this is not specifically see the power! But this force does exist objectively, as the same gravity. But the beast has only recognized a specific brother can see, once seen, not admit its existence. This does not, animal recognizes only one brother of specific cultural patterns, not recognized as a culture, which reflects the stubborn beast brother and lack of knowledge. By the type of social practice and awareness activities, and after long-term values of breeds and shape, aesthetic interest, ways of thinking and so on, not like it? Where to find their specific cultural form it?

Mr. Beast, cultural patterns do not exist under high and low points, which I like, but obviously, Mr. Beast is set in a trap here is that different periods and different geographical, cultural patterns do not exist under high and low points, and therefore do not have the culture under high and low points (here again Mr. Beast cultural patterns for the concept of culture). Now let us assume that the conclusion is correct, Mr. Beast, that is really no culture under high and low points, then ask the animal brothers and culture will develop? Class society will progress? Culture can deny Mr. forward it? I think, Mr. Beast is difficult to deny, therefore, under the sub-culture is not to say high and low, but is deceived by their own nationalism lies Bale. For example: the feudal social system and the capitalist system, not really the next ranking points? Free love and the arranged marriage really is no better than it? Mr. and animal scenes give examples of marriage, just behind that of advanced culture culture shock, the long robe as comfortable than suits and ties have been out of generosity, of course, have to wear clothing if there is one, and I was not right. Well due to the pluralistic coexistence.

oasis in the desert is all about. Finally, Mr. Beast has basically been paid to surrender, do not believe, you see: \tools, real or a replica of my recipe. What will the individual class bring happiness? Traditional culture or Western culture, it is not obvious bald lice it? \Reads now, the beast brother finally revealed his true features: The original point of view and I have no differences, but for a way of saying it. It is said that Mr. Shou just bought a new car,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that car, but a product of Western culture, yo.

the whole text of Mr. Beast, is still good, but a little Rao, Mr. Ying animals accustomed to writing papers written in the essay is not so handy. For example, such words of Mr. passage: the so-called \does not mean \The taste of a kind of show off here. In fact, \Mr. Shou how much of a big circle around it? In addition to showing off I really do not see any other purpose. This is the beast behind the need to pay attention, Mr.,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], do not let the truth of language games and lost in the house. Writing essays is to understand it, rather than around confused. Essays are thought to win, not to see who can beat about the bush ah, hehe.

Finally, I want to thank the discussion, Mr. Beast, I hope Mr. Beast cultural issues in the end.

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]