www.bewet.fora.pl
Wszystko o zwierzętach.
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj
Forum www.bewet.fora.pl Strona Główna
->
Bewet pomaga
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Sklep
----------------
Informacje i opinie.
Promocje.
Konkursy.
Pomoc dla zwierząt
----------------
Zwierzaki w potrzebie
Bewet pomaga
Żywienie,higiena,zdrowie.
----------------
Żywienie, higiena, zdrowie.
Artykuły dla zwierząt.
----------------
Artykuły dla zwierząt.
Nasi ulubieńcy.
----------------
Nasi ulubieńcy.
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
kenyarichieh
Wysłany: Śro 7:59, 22 Gru 2010
Temat postu: cheap marlboro cigarettes
“They all have the basic factual allegation that tobacco companies engaged in consumer fraud when they put out marketing to represent that so-called ‘light’ cigarettes would in fact deliver less tar and nicotine to smokers and would also be less hazardous than regular cigarettes,” said Edward Sweda,
marlboro cigarettes
, senior staff attorney for the Tobacco Products Liability Project at the Boston-based Public Health Advocacy Institute, which helps attorneys with tobacco litigation.
“They made those representations knowing that was not the case.” The lead plaintiff in New Hampshire is Karen Lawrence of Manchester. Lawrence could not be reached yesterday. According to the suit, Lawrence bought and smoked an average of 1? to two packs a day of Marlboro Lights for nearly 30 years. Lawrence switched from regular Marlboro brand cigarettes to Marlboro Lights about 1973,
wholesale marlboro cigarettes
, believing that light cigarettes presented reduced health risks.
“Through the misrepresentations associated with Marlboro Lights (Philip Morris) represented that these cigarettes contained lower levels of tar and nicotine and were,
newport 100s cigarettes
, thereby, less harmful by using words such as‘Lights’and ‘Lowered Tar & Nicotine’,
newport cigarettes
,” Lawrence’s attorneys wrote. The lawsuit claims that Philip Morris developed a way to control the amount of tar and nicotine that registers in machine tests ? which are used to determine whether a cigarette can be marketed as light ? while still delivering the same amount of tar and nicotine to consumers and producing smoke that is more toxic than smoke from regular Marlboros.
Lawrence asked the judge to certify a class that includes everyone who bought Marlboro Lights in New Hampshire since Philip Morris first started selling them in 1971. Lawrence estimated that the number would be in the hundreds of thousands. Lawrence is asking the judge to make Philip Morris pay triple the amount of either any actual damages or $1,000 per class member, plus a refund of the money customers paid for Marlboro Lights and any profits the company made from the cigarettes.
In addition to Douglas’s firm, Douglas, Leonard and Garvey,
marlboro cigarettes supplier
, Lawrence is represented by attorneys in St. Louis and Chicago from the firm of Korein Tillery,
marlboro cigarettes wholesale
, a leader in tobacco class action suits. Philip Morris argued that a class action suit is inappropriate, since each individual plaintiff must prove that a false statement by Philip Morris caused an injury and specify the amount of that injury.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin