0411awosfd
Dołączył: 11 Kwi 2011
Posty: 48
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Pon 3:26, 16 Maj 2011 Temat postu: Cheap Nike Air Zoom Let Go of My Ego |
|
|
ave studied literature in presidency and spirituality and have base a prevalent thread. The mutual thread is this: if you ambition apt be successful and fulfilled you absence apt reserve your self in retard.
The ego is that part of us that is always asking: "But what about me?" or mentioning "Look at me!" The lesson I've found in these fields of study and in my own life is that when we focus on our ego needs we can, at best, establish a transient success. Often our ego gets in the access, creating pain and suffering. If we want to create a good life, a agreeable company, or a good relationship, we need to take the focus off our individual need to win,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], to be right, or to receive the glory.
Jim Collins, writer of Good to Great, did roomy research to detect companies that effected greatness. He found companies that had been ordinary for annuals and then became great companies, creating a sustainable success. These companies outperformed their competitors several periods over. Collins found that all of the leaders of these great companies demonstrate "a paradoxical mixture of private humility and professional will. They are somewhat self-effacing individuals who deflect adulation, yet who have an almost stoic determine to do absolutely whatever it takes to make the company great, channeling their ego needs away from themselves and into the larger goal of building a great company."
These chairmen, along to Collins, see in the mirror, directing their attention to themselves when problems appear. They take full liability. When successes occur they look out their window, directing praise and honor to those who serve with them. These chairmen go in concert with additional leaders to cocreate a great organization. (References to Jim Collin's work found in the story, "The Misguided Mix-Up of Celebrity and Leadership" found at in the articles section)
In 1978, in Superbowl XXII, the extremely touted Denver Broncos football team were beaten by the Dallas Cowboys. The Cowboys played with accuracy and focus, executing plays that were impossible to justify. After the game, one of the Broncos said: "Dallas buffet us because we were focused on winning, and they were focused aboard football." The ego wants to conquer, yet a focus on winning has us forgetting what it takes to get there. True winning comes from playing the game well and playing it for a team.
Today we have many celebrity CEO's, authors, players, players, politicians, and TV personalities. Fame, preferably than creature a outcome of doing something well, is often an bring ... to an end itself. There is nothing wrong with fame. The answer is, if you are penetrated as a leader, as someone to be admired, what the end of the daying value are you creating? Would others do well to follow the instance you set? Does your example influence others to express their own greatness?
A recent paperback, Made to Stick (Heath and Heath), mentions studies that have shown that human who hear to a charismatic speaker often can't memorize everything the spokesman said. Speakers who were unforgettable, that is, their message stuck, were competent to connect with their audience via sagas and well structured messages.
It is the ego in us that has us placing premium worth on egocentric personalities to guide us and be our models. Data and experience suggest that we might better focus on doing what we do well. It suggests that we might focus our care on structure up others, mentoring, and assisting them. It suggests that the playing field may be extra class than we thought, that anybody can build success if they can step outdoor of their ego and do something well. Charisma and attractiveness are as much liabilities as they are assets.
Humility, channeling one's stamina in to something bigger than the ego, cocreation, explicit converge, and connectedness to others--these are all peculiarities namely fall into the realm of spirituality. These traits don't seem to appropriate with today's idea of excellent leadership--the swash buckling, egotistical, somebody who dives in and saves the day, the su
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|