www.bewet.fora.pl

tonyqpmszx

A respondent, Nelly Ogbonnaya, however says that the fact that people do not complain in the presence of a smoker,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], does not mean that such persons are not appalled by the act. She says the need to be sociable and conformist in nature, accounts for why most people do not openly complain. “For someone like me, I do not hesitate to tell anyone smoking beside me to put out the lights of the cigarette, or at least turn it away from me.[link widoczny dla zalogowanych].
Why should I suffer the fate of a smoker, when I do not smoke? The ban is in order,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and more needs to be done to ensure that it is enforced. Secondhand smokers suffer more than the hardened smokers,” she says. She may be right on the mark. Serial research statistics on cumulative effects of smoking, show that secondhand smokers face tougher health challenges,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], than actual smokers. It also reveals some startling facts. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of toxic chemicals including arsenic ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], benzene, and vinyl chloride.
It is known to cause cancer, coronary heart disease, and respiratory problems. There is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the end of a burning cigarette,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], pipe or cigar, and exhaled from the lungs of smokers. This is also known as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Environmental tobacco smoke hangs around in the air for hours after the cigarette has been extinguished, and cause many health complications.
It can cause premature death in children and adults who do not smoke, and is believed to cause about 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 heart deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year. Other nations record equally huge casualties. Just over one in five children is exposed to secondhand smoke at home, where workplace bans don’t reach. Those children are at increased risk of SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, lung infections such as pneumonia, ear infections, and more severe asthma.
Of particular interest is the finding that baby boomers between the ages of 44 and 54 report higher levels of smoking than either those immediately younger or those who are older. After peaking in the high 20% range for Americans in their 20s, smoking rates drop to 21% at age 40. After that point, instead of continuing to drop, smoking prevalence rises, climbing back to 27% among Americans age 51. Smoking then decreases again, eventually reaching 20% among those age 59, and typically well below that for those age 60 and older. 1880s: U.S. Women’s Christian Temperance Movement publishes a leaflet that discusses evils of tobacco,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], especially cigarettes.
Cigarettes are “doing more to-day to undermine the constitution of our young men and boys than any other one evil.” 1893: Cigar-smoking President Grover Cleveland is secretly operated on for cancer of the mouth. 1901: 3.5 billion cigarettes and 6 billion cigars are sold. Four in five American men smoke at least one cigar a day. 1902: Philip Morris sets up a corporation on Broad Street in New York to sell its British brands, including one named “Marlboro“ named after “Great Marlborough Street,” site of Philip Morris’ original factory in London. 1904: A judge in New York sends a woman is sent to jail for 30 days for smoking in front of her children.marlboro gold packs.
1908: New York city passes Sullivan Act, forbidding women to smoke in public. Managers of public establishments must not permit females to smoke. An earlier ordinance which would have forbidden men to smoke in the presence of women failed to pass. One Katie Mulcahy is arrested for lighting up. Two weeks after enactment,marlboro cigarettes, Mayor George B. McClellan vetoes the ordinance. 1929: Fritz Lickint of Dresden publishes the first formal statistical evidence of a lung cancer-tobacco link, based on a case series showing that lung cancer sufferers were likely to be smokers. Lickint also argued that tobacco use was the best way to explain the fact that lung cancer struck men four or five times more often than women (since women smoked much less).