www.bewet.fora.pl

tammi0t9q2g

Half a month ago, the biggest creditor Great Wall AMC and without the knowledge of Guizhou Supreme Court to 50 million yuan price of this mark to the other creditors of satisfaction.
But none have Guizhou Supreme Court response.
“Relevant persons in Guizhou Supreme Court did not meet with us, the written order has yet to reach our office.” Great Wall AMC name Guizhou work one week, said the Director.
I am a professional writer from China Crafts Suppliers, which contains a great deal of information about roasted sunfl
Then, start the Office of the Great Wall AMC Guizhou request to the court ruling, the largest creditors are prepared to put forward as opposition to execution.
Guizhou Province Higher People’s Court civil ruling a piece of paper to the Great Wall Asset Management Corporation debt hanging over one billion yuan. Great Wall AMC debtor
Guizhou Cereals, Oils and business stagnation, the brink of bankruptcy, the only of its own pocket valuable MOUTAI Wine “Flying” brand ownership and foreign trademark in 18 countries and regions registered the trademark. Guizhou Cereals, Oils and more than 1 billion yuan owed to the Great Wall AMC debt.
Guizhou Supreme Court related to civil halls, said: “The case has been transferred to the civil-office.
10 claims vacant 10 11, Great Wall AMC Office of Guizhou, general manager of a staff member rushed into the office: “Let the debtor’s assets in Guizhou Cereals, Oils and heard by the court to award other enterprise.”
grain Guizhou Province Food Import and export company has Guizhou Maotai Wine “Flying” brand. This mark is business stagnation, the brink of bankruptcy in the hands of Guizhou Cereals, Oils and most valuable asset, the Great Wall AMC Guizhou Cereals, Oils and debt owed to more than one billion yuan.
On the same day, Guizhou, the largest creditor in the absence of notice the Great Wall AMC’s case, Guizhou Moutai owned grain and oil, “Flying” registered trademark discount 50 million yuan, cover trade in Guizhou Province corresponding obligations of state-owned asset management companies.
Reporter has learned that on October 14 morning, the Great Wall AMC Office of Guizhou Guizhou Supreme People’s Court to the implementation of the objection [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], at the same time serve a copy of Guizhou Supreme Court, but received the text of the judge refused to sign.
“Guizhou Supreme Court did not seize the property is indeed a fair assessment of the value, not through open auction process, nor to seek the views of the creditors directly and make a civil determination … … Our more than 10 billion state-owned Financial All suspended claims. “The Great Wall AMC Guizhou office official said.
Great Wall AMC office had no choice but to Guizhou in the form of EMS, in at half past nine on the October 17 re-sent to Guizhou Supreme Court, and presented to the emergency report.
“Liabilities of more than 10 billion is not small number, how sentence did not notify us before the largest creditor?” Rapid, general manager of Guizhou, contact the Office of the Court.
On AMC, this is just another huge sum of “Tao Feizhai” case, and the name of the implementation of this law, “Tao Feizhai” not uncommon. Analysis commissioned by the Great Wall AMC, said the experts argued that this practice is contrary to relevant laws.
The other side, a paper with the implementation of Guizhou Supreme Court ruling was lifted on October 19 and other debt were the Great Wall AMC Guizhou Cereals, Oils and seizure of property, and transfer to the Guizhou trade mark.
Reporter saw the “high-Zhi Zi Qian civil ruling No. 14″ display, “flying” trademark to the satisfaction of all business in Guizhou.
Currently, the Great Wall AMC has to submit the relevant emergency Supreme People’s Court report.